Executive Summary: On July 26, 2018, the California Supreme Court ruled that Starbucks must pay employees for minutes, maybe even seconds, spent on off-the-clock “work” by determining that the Plaintiff’s alleged class action state wage claims are not barred by the de minimis doctrine. Continue reading
Executive Summary: Earlier this week, in Lewis v. Governor of Alabama, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20635, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals resurrected a lawsuit alleging Alabama’s predominantly-white state legislature discriminated against the workers in Birmingham, a predominantly black city, by overriding the city’s ordinance to increase the city’s minimum wage. While changes to the minimum wage often elicit strong opinions from employers, workers, and other interested parties, few laws have engendered the passions and inspired the racially-charged allegations presented in Lewis. As discussed below, in light of the Eleventh Circuit’s recent opinion, employers and workers in Birmingham must continue to wait to see if the city’s increased minimum wage will ever take effect.
Executive Summary: On July 13, 2018, the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued a Field Assistance Bulletin (“FAB”) aimed at clarifying the standard utilized to determine if home care workers qualify as employees or joint employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Over the past few years, the DOL has issued and then withdrawn guidance regarding the proper standard and evaluation of home worker classification, leaving uncertainty for the industry. The new guidance provides clarity on the subject and provides home care registries a road map for proper classification.
In Asalde v. First Class Parking Sys., LLC, No. 16-16814, ___ F.3d ___, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 17935 (11th Cir. June 29, 2018), a collective action for unpaid minimum wage and overtime, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found, in a split decision, that foreign-made uniforms worn by parking lot valets create a genuine issue of fact concerning an employer’s “enterprise” coverage under the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “handling clause.” Continue reading